Even in a recent attempt to rewatch the original film, Greenland, hoping to find something I might’ve missed, most of my issues remained unchanged. The exhaustive repetition and manufactured melodrama continued to prevent me from truly connecting with that story. However, cinema has these curious quirks: for some inexplicable reason, my brain convinced me this sequel could be different. I entered the theater moderately hopeful, but prepared for the same old conventions.
Directed once again by Ric Roman Waugh (Angel Has Fallen), with a screenplay by Chris Sparling (Buried) and Mitchell LaFortune (Kandahar), Greenland 2: Migration takes us five years after the extinction event that forced the Garrity family to seek refuge in Greenland’s bunkers. When underground life becomes unsustainable, John (Gerard Butler, Plane), Allison (Morena Baccarin, Deadpool), and the now-teenage Nathan (Roman Griffin Davis, Jojo Rabbit) are forced to emerge to the surface. The goal is to cross a devastated and frozen Europe in search of a new home.
I was genuinely caught off guard. Greenland 2: Migration proved to be a superior experience to its predecessor. Narratively, the movie adopts a structure that, while formulaic, works in its favor. The progression resembles video game logic: each sequence presents a clear challenge — whether it’s a tense shootout, crossing a physical obstacle, or the need to flee. However, unlike the first flick, which relied exhaustively on the cycle of the family separating and reuniting, the sequel offers variety. The creativity in constructing these phases kept me invested, as it’s not just people running in panic; it’s a family solving tactical problems in a hostile world.
One of the strongest points of this continuation lies in the performances. The cast had already shown competence, but here the material allows them to reach a more impactful level. There’s a noticeable authenticity in the emotional moments that was previously lacking; the interactions feel less artificial and more like genuine human reactions to trauma. Butler shines by shedding his invulnerable action-hero cape. His John Garrity isn’t an untiring warrior, but a physically weakened man, carrying the weight of half a decade of darkness and several “walks” into the toxic exterior. Baccarin accompanies him with ferocity, evolving into a realistic pragmatist, while Davis transforms the son into an active participant in his own survival.
The global hostility is amplified by Martin Ahlgren‘s cinematography, which makes the most of the apocalyptic landscape. Greenland 2: Migration breathes better outside the bunker. The wide shots of destruction grant an epic and desolate scale to the characters’ journey. Seeing the wreckage of a frozen civilization — cities in ruins and a dried-up English Channel — offers a thematic weight that the original rarely achieved. Here, the antagonist is nature’s own indifference. The setting becomes a character, constantly reminding the protagonists of their insignificance before the vastness of the disaster.
However, not everything is visually impeccable. The visual effects remain a question mark. There are moments where the quality oscillates — possibly due to budget or time constraints. It never becomes as problematic as in the original, and there are well-executed digital shots that sell the scale of devastation, but the inconsistency is noticeable in other wider shots. Fortunately, the atmosphere created by practical production design and real locations helps mask these digital flaws, maintaining immersion.
As is customary in this type of disaster film, the script asks for some suspension of disbelief regarding resource management. Fuel and ammunition seem, at times, conveniently accessible in a world that should be depleted. However, these “movie logic” issues become irrelevant in the face of the emotional narrative’s effectiveness. We’re here for the characters’ journey, not to audit the apocalypse’s inventory, and the sequel maintains enough pace so that no one gets stuck on these minor details.
That said, there’s one omission that deserves highlighting: the complete removal of the son’s diabetic condition. On one hand, I feel immense relief, as the constant search for insulin was one of the elements that most annoyed me in the previous film, being a needless cliché used to create artificial conflict. On the other hand, it’s strange that a life-or-death element is now ignored without much explanation. It’s a decision that improves Greenland 2: Migration in isolation, allowing the focus to shift from illness to interpersonal dynamics, but it creates a curious dissonance for those who have the first chapter fresh in their minds.
Thematically, this choice also reflects the desire to abandon the dead weight of the past to tell a more direct story. The sequel explores the difference between surviving and living. While the first chapter was about the instinct not to die, this one questions the value of that survival in a concrete hole. The migration is both physical and psychological — the transition from paralyzing fear to the acceptance of a new world. There’s an underlying melancholy in seeing these characters try to maintain their humanity when the old rules no longer apply…
Final Thoughts on Greenland 2: Migration
Greenland 2: Migration is the first surprise of the year, standing out as a remarkable evolution of the original by swapping repetitive melodrama for a more tactical and emotionally engaging survival narrative. While not free of visual hiccups or script conveniences, the sequel compensates with robust performances and direction that knows how to value the scale of desolation. It’s an immersive experience that proves that even when the world ends, there’s still room to find new paths amidst the rubble, as long as we’re willing to walk forward instead of constantly checking the rearview mirror.
Rating: A-
Greenland 2: Migration is now playing in theaters.
Learn more about the film, including how to buy tickets, at the official website for the title.
You might also like…
