Before watching a new Ron Howard film, I always carry with me a certain map of expectations. The filmmaker behind A Beautiful Mind (2001) and Apollo 13 (1995) has built a career marked by human stories with strong emotional appeal, coupled with a classical, assured direction that’s rarely devoid of substance. Learning that he would adapt such a curious and dark real episode as the one on Floreana Island – where different European settlers attempted to found their paradise only to plunge into conflict, hunger, and tragedy – made it inevitable to expect a work of intense moral reflection. Noah Pink’s screenplay, following his work on Tetris (2023), only heightened the anticipation: a writer accustomed to handling real-life events through cinematic dramatization, now staging a study on the impossibility of escaping one’s own human condition.
The story follows German doctor Friedrich Ritter (Jude Law, The Talented Mr. Ripley), a man of rigid principles who decides to leave Europe and its decadence behind to live according to an austere philosophy of life, where even the way one eats, breathes, and loves must obey unbreakable rules. Alongside Dore Strauch (Vanessa Kirby, The Fantastic Four: First Steps), Ritter believes he has found the perfect opportunity to live in purity, freedom, and rationality. But soon other settlers arrive on the island with very different ideals: Heinz Wittmer (Daniel Brühl, Good Bye, Lenin!) and his wife Margret (Sydney Sweeney, Immaculate) seek only stability and a new beginning, while Baroness Eloise Bosquet de Wagner Wehrhorn (Ana de Armas, Blade Runner 2049) lands with the explicit goal of building a luxury hotel. The tensions that arise between these competing visions of paradise turn the experiment into a portrait of civilization’s inevitable fissures, which quickly reproduce the same vices that everyone claimed they wanted to leave behind.
The natural beauty of Queensland, Australia – where Eden was shot – serves as the perfect backdrop for this narrative. Mathias Herndl’s (The Twilight Zone) camera presents an isolated island with lush vegetation and disarming beauty, but never allows us to be fully enchanted: there’s always something threatening, a hint of danger lurking beneath the idyllic surface. This contrast between dazzling exterior and corrosive interior becomes the clearest image of the story itself – utopian dreams that seem flawless from a distance but crumble as soon as they collide with necessity, envy, and the simple reality of living alongside other human beings.
Yet, some technical choices hinder immersion. The cast’s accents sound disjointed, almost artificial, stripping away authenticity from interactions that should feel natural. On top of that, there are occasional ADR issues, with lines not syncing properly with lip movements. These are details that, in a production of this scale, weigh more than they should – especially because they contrast with the evident commitment of the cast. Law, for instance, finds in Ritter one of the most fascinating arcs of Eden: the man who wouldn’t eat meat, who defended a life in harmony with nature, and who presented himself as a model of discipline, gradually transforms into a distorted reflection of everything he condemned. His moral degradation mirrors his physical decline: as hunger grows and social frustrations pile up, the idealist who dreamed of a pure world becomes the embodiment of how idealism can be corrupted by reality. It’s the strongest example of how the movie reflects the fragility of any utopia.
Dore first appears as a steadfast partner, determined to prove she can live by the strict principles of her companion. But slowly, her façade collapses. The desire to be respected and loved becomes stronger than any ideology, and she ultimately allows herself to be consumed by resentment and revenge. Through her, Howard shows how even those who appear strong and convinced can be corroded by the need for validation, revealing how emotional survival weighs just as heavily as physical survival.
In contrast, Eloise embodies vanity and manipulation. Convinced of her perfection and aware of the power of her beauty, she uses her magnetism to seduce, conquer, and manipulate those around her. We never truly meet the woman behind the mask: she exists only as the image she projects and as the reflection of those who idolize her. It’s a sharp representation of how ego and ambition erode any notion of community, serving as a reminder that paradise can be destroyed not only by need, but also by narcissism.
If Eloise represents vanity’s extreme, Margret is Eden‘s human heart. Sweeney’s performance surprises with the genuine innocence she conveys, but also with the cunning hidden beneath her softness. Margret longs for peace, love, and neighborly friendship; she values family above all, but perceives far more than she lets on. Together with Heinz, she forms the most realistic and emotionally grounded couple in the film. Heinz may be tempted by Ritter’s ideas, but he always remains tied to his home and his love for his family. What this couple illustrates is the attempt to preserve civilization not in abstract philosophy, but in the small things of everyday life: family, sharing, care. Their storyline best symbolizes how civilization, even in miniature, is fragile yet still capable of endurance.
It’s precisely in this coexistence of different human profiles that Eden finds its thematic strength. Each character functions as a distinct lens through which we perceive the collapse of utopian dreams: Ritter depicts how idealism corrodes under the weight of reality; Dore exposes the fragility of bonds when love is unreciprocated; Eloise demonstrates manipulation as a survival tactic; and Margret and Heinz prove that even when civilization fails, there’s still room for a trace of humanity. What emerges is an inevitable spiral of violence, as if peace were impossible without conflict, and as if society were doomed to repeat the same mistakes even when starting from scratch.
Howard conducts this tragedy with steady direction. The filmmaker often frames scenes to capture not just the central action but also what unfolds in the background, reinforcing the sense that something is always on the verge of collapse. It’s a cohesive piece of work, yet one that cannot resist the pull of melodrama: certain moments feel overly emphasized, with the emotional weight hammered more heavily than necessary, reducing the impact of the real-life events that inspired it. At times, the narrative prefers to box characters into well-defined archetypes, when it might have been stronger had it embraced ambiguity and uncertainty.
Final Thoughts on Eden
Eden is a compelling portrayal of the downfall of utopian dreams against the inevitability of human nature. The performances are solid, the cinematography immersive, and the themes echo well beyond the big screen. But excessive dramatization, technical hiccups, and some less fortunate stylistic choices prevent the movie from reaching the greatness it so clearly aspired to. The result is an interesting study, with powerful moments, but one that leaves the impression it could have been far more impactful had it trusted less in melodrama and more in the rawness of the facts.
Rating: B-
Eden is now playing in theaters.
Learn more about the film at the IMDB site for the title.
You might also like…
